White settlers and the U. S. Government believed they had a right to buy land from American Indians. Tecumseh and his followers argued that the Indians did not have the right to sell the land. The two groups had different points of view. On the next page, you will write a statement about each point of view. Make sure your statements are free of spelling and grammar errors.

From the point of view of the settlers:

The American Indians were the first people to settle on this land. They are also the people who currently live in it. Therefore, if we want to acquire it, we have to buy it from them. This is not unfair, as long as we pay them a fair price. Moreover, we are going to make good use of the land, as we mostly want to use it for agriculture, while they do not take advantage of it in the way that they should.

From the point of view of the American Indians:

We do not have the right to sell this land. Even though we live here, we are not the owners of it, as no one owns nature. The land was given to us by nature, and we use it, but we cannot do with it whatever we please. We also have to consider the needs of other creatures that live in it, and of the future generations that will use it. Therefore, since we do not own it, we also cannot sell it.

the bar kochba rebellion (132-135) against the roman empire, also known as the second jewish-roman war, was the second major jewish revolt in judea and the last of the great jewish-roman wars.

after the first jewish-roman war of the years 66-73, the roman authorities took measures to crush any new attempt of rebellion in judea. his political situation was modified and instead of a prefect a governor of praetorian rank was appointed, and in the ruins of jerusalem the seat of a complete roman legion, the legio x fretensis was established.

the political and religious direction of the jewish people was left in the hands of the sanhedrin, with initial headquarters in yavne.

the direct causes of the rebellion vary according to the source. the roman historian dio cassius (155-229) attributes the revolt to the decision of hadrian to found in the place of jerusalem a roman city called aelia capitolina (aelia by its own name and capitolina in honor of the roman god jupiter). on the other hand, the jewish sources, while recognizing this resolution as true, assign higher priority to the decrees dictated by hadrian that forbade the brit milah (circumcision), the respect of the sabbath and the laws of purity in the family.

hadrian's intention was to "civilize" and incorporate the jews once and for all into the greco-roman culture. for greek and roman culture, circumcision was an intolerable mutilation.

the jewish tradition tells in the midrash tanjuma a meeting between rabbi akiva and the governor turnus rufus, where he asked for an explanation about the circumcision.

an additional legion, the legio vi ferrata, moved to the province to maintain order, and work began in the year 131 after the governor of judea, turnus rufus performed the founding ceremony of aelia capitolina. a roman coin with the inscription aelia capitolina was struck in the year 132.

the tannaim rabbi akiva, who without being named nasi directed the sanhedrin, convinced the other members to support the imminent rebellion.

the jewish leaders carefully planned the second rebellion to avoid the numerous errors that had been committed in the first one. in the year 132 the rebellion led by bar kochba quickly expanded from modiim throughout the country, defeating the x roman legion based in jerusalem and destroying the xxii roman legion that had come from egypt.

possible the invasion of room could have been avodiable but the people of rome were to stubboron and to wealthy the kingdoms saw them as a threat if they dialred it downa   bit ten i dont think they wouldnt failed   china was not iacvvdoaible they caused war to much and were out of hand therefor that must have happened india i dont really know it could of