William Lloyd Garrison argued in Thoughts on African Colonization that:a. blacks could never fully achieve equality in America and would be happier in Africa. b. because slaves were uneducated, it was necessary to educate them in America before sending them to Africa. c. blacks were not "strangers" in America to be shipped abroad, but should be recognized as a permanent part of American society. d. colonization should be subsidized through a tax on cotton. e. because blacks had no political experience, Garrison himself ought to be appointed governor of the African colony.

Option A.

Explanation:

William lyod Garrison was the son of a sailing master and was born in Massachusetts in 1805. Due to the embargo acts passed by congress in 1807, his family faced hard times and his father deserted the family in 1808. At age 25, He joined the Abolition movement and became associated with American colonization organisation. This organization believed freed Africans should emigrate to African, their intentions was to promote the happiness and freedom of Africans.

William argued that Africans can never achieve equality in America and would be happier in Africa.

honestly i really it keep confusion down on some sides

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: