subject
History, 20.04.2020 04:18 kimmy6973

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless .
A.
two witnesses are present when they make their statement
B.
they have been advised of their rights
C.
the defense attorney gives permission for it to be used
D.
the suspect becomes violent with arresting officers

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:30
Read each statement and decide whether it applies to ellis island, angel island, or both: 1. most immigrants were from china or another asian nation. 2. immigrants had to pass health inspections before being admitted to the united states. 3. immigrants could be denied entry or sent back to their home countries.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
The gandhi video focuses on a daily spiritual" ritual in this leader's later life. how does the informational piece differ in its focus"?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
What was going on with south asia before europeans came ?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What was the name of the totalitarian party in italy? a. nazib. communistsc. fascists d. socialist
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unl...
Questions
question
Biology, 03.07.2019 14:00
question
Spanish, 03.07.2019 14:00
question
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 14:00