Which statement explains why the american public reacted differently to the formation of the united nations than it had to the formation of league of nations? a] the end of world war ii did not result in the same isolationism in the united states that had resulted after world war i.

b] the united nations was supported by all of the allies, whereas the league of nations had been opposed by most of the allies.

c] the american public was more concerned about communism after world war ii than it had been after world war i.

d] the united states was not expected to contribute as much money to the united nations as it would have to the league of nations.

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

can you post options?