I’ll give you 50 points !

How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea
of social contract protect people's natural and individual rights?

First, what is meant by social contract? By definition, in Webster's dictionary, a social contract is, "an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits, for example by sacrificing some individual freedom for protection." Thus, we as citizens of the United States, are part of a social contract in that we elect representatives to govern our nation, our states, and us. That being said, our government exists to serve us, and as it says in the Constitution allow us to enjoy" life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." So, our agreement as stated in the Constitution is that we, as citizens DO NOT have to give up any of our rights in order for our government to protect us. If we look at the former U.S.S.R. where citizens were forced to give up a large majority of their individual freedoms, they were also taught what to think and what to say by their government.

Social contracts, such as our Constitution, clearly defines what our rights and liberties are. Our representatives make laws, our court system enforces the laws. With our system of checks and balances, no one part of our government is more powerful than the other, thus we as Americans do enjoy "certain inalienable rights," that many other governments do not allow their citizens.

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.