"Harlem Renaissance" was the name Select one: A. given to a housing project in New York City's Harlem B. of a city in Holland C. sometimes given to a flowering of African American culture during the years 1917-1935 D. of a symphony by William Grant Still

C. sometimes given to a flowering of African American culture during the years 1917 - 1935

Explanation:

The Harlem Renaissance span in 1920s as an intellectual, social, and artistic explosion in Harlem, Manhattan, New York City.

it was also known as the New Negro Movement, taken after The New Negro, a 1925 anthology

The answer is C.

Explanation:

The Harlem Renaissance gets its name from the place that it started which is Harlem, Manhattan in New York City around the early years of 1920s, just after the end of world war 1. It represents the artistic and creative increase during those years in Harlem especially in the African American communities. So the answer is that it is a name that's given to a flowering African American culture between 1917 and 1935.

I hope this answer helps.

"a shortage of traditional labor created new opportunities in the workplace. a major cause of the internment of japanese americans during world war ii was. racial prejudice. in the early 1940's, the "destroyers-for-military-bases deal" with great britain and the lend-lease act were evidence that the united states."

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is