subject
History, 09.04.2020 20:19 evere11605

*this is gonna be a 5 questions ill give brainliest answer also please help...*

What was Daniel Webster's position on slavery?

A: He was against slavery
B: He argued that slavery was necessary, benefiting both slaves and slave owners
C: He was against slavery but owned slaves

Question 3
What was John C Calhoun's position on slavery?

A: He was against slavery but owned slaves
B: He argued that slavery was necessary, benefiting both slaves and slave owners
C: He was against slavery

Question 4
What was Henry Clay's position on slavery?

A: He was against slavery but owned slaves
B: He was against slavery
C: He argued that slavery was necessary, benefiting both slaves and slave owners

Question 5
How did John C. Calhoun of South California view the power of the states and the power of the federal government?

A: He thought the federal government had final authority over states in all matters.
B: He thought states could decide which federal laws to obey and which to ignore.
C: He believed that states could ignore other states' laws but must obey federal laws.
D: He believed strongly in the Union and the power of compromise in balancing rights.

Question 6
Daniel Webster of Massachusetts was against slavery but he agreed to compromise on the issue. Why?

A: He wanted to run for president and needed southern support.
B: He was willing to do almost anything to keep the United States together.
C: He wanted to appeal to the pro-slavery majority of voters in Massachusetts.
D: He was swayed by John C. Calhoun's sound arguments in favor of slavery.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
What two arguments is franklin d. roosevelt making in this excerpt from his "four freedoms" speech? four freedoms by franklin d. roosevelt (excerpt) it is true that prior to 1914 the united states often had been disturbed by events in other continents. we had even engaged in two wars with european nations and in a number of undeclared wars in the west indies, in the mediterranean and in the pacific for the maintenance of american rights and for the principles of peaceful commerce. but in no case had a serious threat been raised against our national safety or our continued independence. what i seek to convey is the historic truth that the united states as a nation has at all times maintained clear, definite opposition, to any attempt to lock us in behind an ancient chinese wall while the procession of civilization went past. today, thinking of our children and of their children, we oppose enforced isolation for ourselves or for any other part of the americas. that determination of ours, extending over all these years, was proved, for example, during the quarter century of wars following the french revolution. while the napoleonic struggles did threaten interests of the united states because of the french foothold in the west indies and in louisiana, and while we engaged in the war of 1812 to vindicate our right to peaceful trade, it is nevertheless clear that neither france nor great britain, nor any other nation, was aiming at domination of the whole world. a) americans should hold on to their isolationist tendencies as long as their own interests are not under threat. b) americans have always fought to uphold human rights and correct injustices against them. c) americans have always been peaceful but should be willing to go to war to defend their allies. d) americans should go to war to protect their allies against the germans and assert their world domination. e) americans should continue to maintain their freedom even in the face of world domination.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
15 points to the "charlemagne" section, what were the two policies that charlemagne implemented when he took the throne? what was the result of the policies and how did it impact his warriors?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
Sanjay solved the equation below. which property did he use to determine that 7x+42=42 is equivalent to 7(x+6)=42 7x+42=42 7x=0 x=0
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
The excerpt is from the universal declaration of human rights. everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. –article 2, universal declaration of human rights this passage from the declaration is designed to a)ensure human rights for united nations members. b)explain how human rights violators will be punished. c)protect human rights of all people in the world. d)grant human rights to the world’s most powerful people.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
*this is gonna be a 5 questions ill give brainliest answer also please help...*

What wa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 06:10