What motivated the large-scale postwar migration to the Sunbelt and the suburbs? To what extent were these movements a result of social changes like the baby boom, and to what extent were they a result of intentional federal government policies like federal housing loans, military spending, and the interstate highway system?

The process of suburbanization and migration to the Sunbelt that took place since the 1950s was the consequence of a series of social processes that meant the saturation of the country's large industrial cities, and the search for many families for friendlier places to raise their children:

-On the one hand, the baby boom that occurred after the end of World War II caused families to expand, which meant that they needed more space, that is, the possibility of having a house instead of an apartment. But these costs were impossible to bear in the big cities, so many of these families began to move to the suburbs or the southern states, where the land was significantly cheaper.

-On the other hand, upon the return of the combatants, the government decided to grant financial aid to them, with the aim of providing stability in the first years of social reintegration after having been in combat. In addition, soft loans were granted in order to guarantee the purchase of homes, which, again, were much cheaper in the suburbs.

-Lastly, government's investments in connectivity (routes, highways, airports, railway connections, etc.) allowed for greater mobility of people, who could now go faster and further. In this way, the development of once remote towns was allowed.

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.  

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.  

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.  

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)  

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei     hope this i had some from the internet u   can report me if u want

dont kniw hope this hepl you