Question 1
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
Use the passage below to answer all parts of the question that follows.
"When the crisis struck, nationalists were quick to identify the cause in (liberalism). As the crisis spread from country to country, global commerce and the gold standard increasingly came
under attack. Once praised as the engine of economic progress and prosperity, international trade was now viewed as a source of foreign contagion. More than ever before, the nation's economy
had to be protected from cheap goods from abroad, and saved from reliance on foreign materials. [Governments raised tariffs) and each time a government did so), it increased the pressure on
others to do likewise. This generated considerable hostility. . . The failure to cooperate in the face of the economic threat of the early 1930s was a harbinger of the inability of the powers to work
together to deal with the threat of aggressive nationalism in the latter part of the decade."
John E. Moser, United States historian, book published in 2015
a) Identify ONE piece of evidence that Moser uses in the passage to support his claim regarding nationalist perceptions of liberal economic policies.
b) Explain ONE development in the late 1930s and early 1940s that could be used to support Moser's argument in the last sentence of the passage.
c) Explain ONE economic policy, other than those mentioned in the passage, that governments in Western Europe and North America adopted in the 1930s to address the economic crisis referred to
in the passage.

one of the major compromises in the constitutional convention was between the small states and big states. the small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in congress. the big states wanted representation based on population.

the enslaved people onboard suffered from illness with some frequency

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.

no one really purchased it themselves, it was all america, they had debates etc.