subject
History, 02.04.2020 03:14 unruhlsY25

In the Scott v. Sandford case, Scott’s argument was based on
the Missouri Compromise.
the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
the Fugitive Slave Act.
the Fourteenth Amendment.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
How did the actions of tsar nicholas 2 and his wife lead to revolution in russia
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
Which is the best description of a political campaign tactic during the ele tion of 1828
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Based on this poster, what conclusion can be made about the u.s. government during world war i? it wanted to boycott trade with enemy nations. it wanted to provide low-cost loans to its allies. it was not able to fully finance the war effort through taxes. it believed the majority of its citizens did not support the war.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which southern colony split into two in 1729
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In the Scott v. Sandford case, Scott’s argument was based on
the Missouri Compromise.
th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.09.2019 12:30