When the Supreme Court hands-down decision in a case that upheld the previous ruling justices are said to be following which principle

a historian is attempting to study how the puritans affected society in new england

i would need the graph to answer the question

the answer is option b.

explanation:

they could veto laws. this announcement does not portray the individuals from the roman senate since the praetor urban was the one that could veto laws. the power or right vested in one part of an administration to drop or put off the choices, institutions, and so on., of another branch, particularly the privilege of a president, representative, or other ceo to dismiss bills gone by the lawmaking body.

i am only doing this for the points.