(Please help, I need a serious answer please, not idk)

john L. O'sullivan described Manifest destiny as meaning that Americam settlers should possess the "whole of the continent" that "Providence" has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and self government. Do you think the same attitudes exist today?

Early settlers of the US considered it divine provenance for them to live there which is not something that has survived to this day.

Explanation:

Early settlers of the US were hard lined religious people who wanted to build a pure country int eh new world but soon found themselves in the middle of a bustling country that did not much care for the divine provenance of the people and their religion.

However, their attachment to the new land and the freedom of self expression and self determination it gave them has passed down through generations and can still be seen in the people.

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.