Most people are familiar with the practice of police reading a suspect their rights to legal counsel during an arrest (“You have the right to remain silent…”), which was established by the case Miranda v. Arizona. If the accused is not informed of these rights, any statements he makes are which of the following?

Any statement he made are not valid because he was not told of him Mirabda law which are part of the fifth ammendment rights.

Explanation:

Miranda can be described as the type of warning that a police officer must notify or inform the person to be arrested. This warning must be known to the arrested individual at the point of arrest.

The following are some of the fifth amendment rights you have based on the principles on Miranda as a suspect to be arrested.

The genesis of Miranda was as a result of the case between Miranda vs Arizona in which the supreme court said the suspect was not told that he has the right to an Anthony before interrogation.

The case was thrown out because he was not notified of all these Miranda laws and all evidence against him was rejected.

the answer is b. hope this !

apartheid, (afrikaans: “apartness”) policy that governed relations between south africa's white minority and nonwhite majority and sanctioned racial segregation and political and economic discrimination against nonwhites. people should not get this wrong. i was just answering a question.