Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?
O
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
O
B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
O
C. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
O
D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened

B.  To learn about conclusions of many other experts on the event

Explanation:

A,C, and D are all examples of first-hand experiences or accounts therefore meaning A,C and D are all primary sources rather than B which is the only secondary source.

the process is called revolution because it was a process of great economic-social transformations that began in england in the xviii century.

the industrial mode of production spread throughout much of the northern hemisphere throughout the xix and early xx centuries.

the effect of this revolution was the distance between the countries, with respect to economic and political power.   after all, not all industrialized at the same time, remaining in the condition of suppliers of raw materials and agricultural products to the industrialized countries.

these differences mark to this day the nations of the world that are divided between developed and developing countries. one way to measure whether a country is advanced is to assess how industrialized it is.

both believe in many god or polytheism

both built temples that they worshiped in both civilization's god were humanoid

both groups made religion a large portion of their lives

both believe in one religion throughout

the dead were buried with items for the afterlife