Frank palko thought the fifth amendment ban on double jeopardy applied to his case
a)he was tried for first degree murder.
b)he was tried for second degree murder.
c)he was first sentenced to life imprisonment.
d)he was tried twice for the same crime.

The correct answer is D. He was tried twice for the same crime

Explanation:

Frank Palko was a Connecticut resident that stole a phonograph from a music store, then when trying to escape he was cornered by the police and then he killed two of the police officers. Palka was first charged with first-degree murder but convicted for second-degree murder and due to this, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. After this, the decision of the court was appealed and the judge decided Palka was guilty of first-degree murder and due to this, he should be sentenced to death. After this, Palka argued he was protected by the Fifth Amendment, in which is it stated a person can be tried only once for the same offense or crime (double jeopardy), as a consequence Palka thought the Fifth Amendment applied to his case because he was tried twice for the same crime (shooting and killing two police officers). However, Palka was executed as it was decided double jeopardy did not apply to his case.

explanation:

ad the excerpt and i will gladly answer

a is the final : )