Asap! give a full answer for this and not some stupid answer
1. you have just been challenged with the question "was alexander great or not? "
your position is that alexander was great, but you will have to persuade everyone else. explain what made alexander the great so great and how he spread greek culture and brought ideas from other cultures to greece.

answer:

here yee go rate brainliest, !

explanation:

his generals fought over his land and in the end it was divided up into multiple states. in 30 b.c., after the last of these states (ptolemaic egypt) was conquered by rome, the roman emperor octavian went to see the body of alexander. the great king had been dead for nearly three centuries but was revered by the romans. "he (octavian) had a desire to see the sarcophagus and body of alexander the great, which, for that purpose, were taken out of the cell in which they rested and after viewing them for some time, he paid honors to the memory of that prince, by offering a golden crown, and scattering flowers upon the body," wrote suetonius tranquillus in the late first century a.d. (translation by alexander thomson, through perseus digital library)"perhaps the most significant legacy of alexander was the range and extent of the proliferation of greek culture," said abernethy. "the reign of alexander the great signaled the beginning of a new era in history known as the hellenistic age. greek culture had a powerful influence on the areas alexander conquered." many of the cities that alexander founded were named alexandria, including the egyptian city that is now home to more than 4.5 million people. the many alexandrias were located on trade routes, which increased the flow of commodities between the east and the west.   "goods and customs, soldiers and traders all mingled together," said abernethy. "there was a common currency and a common language (greek) uniting the many peoples of the empire. all religions were tolerated. it was to be a golden age that lasted from the death of alexander in 323 b.c. until 31 b.c., the date of the conquest of the last hellenistic kingdom by rome, the lagid kingdom of egypt."

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.