Important hw 25 pts and mark as brainliest
what do you think the world look like today if europe had not experienced its age of discovery? explain how the world might be different if there had been no european exploration and expansion. include at least two examples of how the world would look or act if things had gone differently.

If Europe had not experienced its Age of Discovery then I think the world would have missed out on globalization and would still be under the age-old regimes unable to thrive politically or advance socially and scientifically.

Explanation:

The Age of Discovery led to multiple explorations around the world. It helped people to know new lands and to explore the different cultures.

If there was no exploration or expansion then the ancient beliefs and monarchy would still be prevalent. Secondly, people would not have known any new land outside their homeland and none of the above stated points would have been possible.

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.