In a court of law, someone can claim ignorance of the law as a legitimate defense. t/f

False

Explanation:

Not knowing the laws of the country a person lives does not prevent him/her  of being judged by breaking them. At any democractic country, citizens not only have rights but also duties in which it is stated the commitment of every citizen to follow the rules stated by the goverment, either through federal or states laws. This is why ignorance is not a legitimate defense.

the answer is option a.

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3