In what ways did post-revolutionary france resemble pre-revolutionary france? in what ways did it not?

WHAT WAS THE SAME 1) reigning dynasty was Bourbon dynasty, 2) there was no democracy and democratic participation on political order (no elections), 3) society continued being not secularized (unity of trone and altar), 4) no free press (freedom of expression). "Declaration de l´homme et du citoyen" (preamble of all French constitutions) was not put in reality. WHAT WAS DIFFERENT: 1) power of dynasty was increasingly dependent on foreign countries, dynasty had weak support from the population, dynasty was put back on the basis of Vienna Congress (1814-1815), 2) French kings had to make concessions (limited monarchy), 3) there were three currents on the right-wing political spectre: - legistimistes (supporting absolute monarchy and Bourbon dynasty), - orleanistes (supporting constitutional monarchy of the house of Orleans), - napoleonistes (supporting house of Napoleon), - there was much less credibility of Bourbon dynasty.

Explanation:

a and b!

dfroos means which is a and b

athenian democracy developed around the fifth century bc in the greek city-state (known as a polis) of athens, comprising the city of athens and the surrounding territory of attica, and is often described as the first known democracy in the world. other greek cities set up democracies, most following the athenian model, but none are as well documented as athens'.

it was a political system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. participation was not open to all residents: to vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a submissive or a woman, and the number of these was "probably no more than 30 percent of the total adult population."[1]

the longest-lasting democratic leader was pericles. after his death, athenian democracy was twice briefly interrupted by oligarchic revolutions towards the end of the peloponnesian war. it was modified somewhat after it was restored under eucleides; the most detailed accounts of the system are of this fourth-century modification rather than the periclean system. democracy was suppressed by the macedonians in 322 bc. the athenian institutions were later revived, but how close they were to a real democracy is debatable. solon (594 bc), cleisthenes (508/7 bc), and ephialtes (462 bc) contributed to the development of athenian democracy. cleisthenes broke up the power of the nobility by organizing citizens into ten groups based on where they lived rather than on their wealth.

hope this !