How is socialism fundamentally different from the economic philosophy promoted by adam smith ?

the difference is a concept of human nature. Adam Smith´s philosophy is based on assumption of competitiveness. People are competitive, they comptete, there is a rivalry between them. All that presupposes individualism, autonomy, initiative, free spirit. Socialism lacks that. Socialism constitutes another sort of onesidedness: its point of departure is that people are good, like to collaborate and share. That is why socialism wants to eliminate all inequalities (that is why it was and perhaps still is attractive).

Explanation: of course things are much more complex. Adam Smith is a man of 18th century, socialism is a concept that was here and there everywhere and all the time with us, but never totally realized. Nevertheless ideas (even those that seem to be the most beautiful) should be always tested in reality.

6 or 2

explanation:

hope this you

but i think its 6

atman means 'eternal self'. the atman refers to the real self beyond ego or false self. it is often referred to as 'spirit' or 'soul' and indicates our true self or essence which underlies our existence.

there are many interesting perspectives on the self in hinduism ranging from the self as eternal servant of god to the self as being identified with god. the understanding of the self as eternal supports the idea of reincarnation in that the same eternal being can inhabit temporary bodies.

the idea of atman entails the idea of the self as a spiritual rather than material being and thus there is a strong dimension of hinduism which emphasises detachment from the material world and promotes practices such as asceticism. thus it could be said that in this world, a spiritual being, the atman, has a human experience rather than a human being having a spiritual experience.

explanation: