(plz ) how did the land ordinance of 1785 affect westward expansion? (pick a specific answer)( answer correctly)

(a) settlers built homesteads west of the mississippi river.

(b) settlers had to live along the mississippi river.

(c) settlers occupied more of the territory east of the mississippi.

(d) settlers had to follow the oregon trail to reach their new lands.

The Land Ordinance of 1985 promoted the settlers to build homesteads to the west of the Mississippi River. The correct option is A

Explanation:

This law enabled that the new territories will be admitted to the United States and this includes the land to the north and the west of the Ohio river. This law encouraged the westward expansion of the territories and it also banned slavery making the regions between the Ohio river free of slavery.

This law also made many new territories the equal member of the Union and they can also purchase the titles for the farm lands and they can follow the standardized system and they can develop more the undeveloped west regions.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

d) in the state of iowa