Suppose you are asked to write an account of a battle that occurred during the vietnam war. which approach would result in a more accurate historical account?

a) compare the reports of several soldiers who fought in the battle.

b) find a story on the internet that tells what happened at the battle.

c) read a novel based on the life of a soldier who died in the battle.

d) watch a movie that includes several scenes from the battle.

woah dude who's thia? need more info

according to howard zinn, the history presents the encounter between columbus and the arawaks as a heroic adventure of descovery but leaves in the shades the cruel slavery and bloodshed columbus led in order to pay back to his investors. he sent the indians back to his nation as a payment, slaved them to find gold in the land and punished them when they didn't find any. history presents columbus as a heroe and even celebrates his day, when in reality he led a genocide. zinn describes the story of the colonization from the arawaks point of view.

i think that they would be noticed if they scream