During 2015 and 2016, susan spaulding was employed as a lathe operator at betts bats, a massachusetts bat maker. ms. spaulding alleges that she was repeatedly harassed by her coworkers because of her gender. allegedly because of the harassment, she left betts's employ in april of 2016. she subsequently secured employment with another sports equipment company. spaulding earned more in her new employment in 2017 than she had in either 2015 or 2016 at betts. in june 2016, spaulding filed a complaint against betts and two of her former coworkers seeking money damages to "remedy betts's discrimination in employment against her based upon gender." her complaint also sought relief under massachusetts labor laws to remedy betts's "failure to pay compensation owed"spaulding alleged that she had suffered "psychological and physical harms" and had been "constructively discharged" from betts by virtue of a hostile work environment caused by the alleged discrimination. she requested compensatory damages, punitive damages, and liquidated damages. in december 2016, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. spaulding agreed that, in exchange for a payment of $45,000, she would release all claims against the defendants including claims for back pay, bonuses, commissions, separation allowance, benefits, severance pay, pension, and health benefits as well as any other claims for compensation with respect to the employment relationship and termination thereof. the settlement agreement did not mention any physical or emotional injury suffered by taxpayer, nor did it state that any portion of the $45,000 was being paid in consideration of claims for physical or emotional harm.

During world war ii who is the commander-in-chief of the pacific fleet

What two arguments is franklin d. roosevelt making in this excerpt from his "four freedoms" speech? four freedoms by franklin d. roosevelt (excerpt) it is true that prior to 1914 the united states often had been disturbed by events in other continents. we had even engaged in two wars with european nations and in a number of undeclared wars in the west indies, in the mediterranean and in the pacific for the maintenance of american rights and for the principles of peaceful commerce. but in no case had a serious threat been raised against our national safety or our continued independence. what i seek to convey is the historic truth that the united states as a nation has at all times maintained clear, definite opposition, to any attempt to lock us in behind an ancient chinese wall while the procession of civilization went past. today, thinking of our children and of their children, we oppose enforced isolation for ourselves or for any other part of the americas. that determination of ours, extending over all these years, was proved, for example, during the quarter century of wars following the french revolution. while the napoleonic struggles did threaten interests of the united states because of the french foothold in the west indies and in louisiana, and while we engaged in the war of 1812 to vindicate our right to peaceful trade, it is nevertheless clear that neither france nor great britain, nor any other nation, was aiming at domination of the whole world. a) americans should hold on to their isolationist tendencies as long as their own interests are not under threat. b) americans have always fought to uphold human rights and correct injustices against them. c) americans have always been peaceful but should be willing to go to war to defend their allies. d) americans should go to war to protect their allies against the germans and assert their world domination. e) americans should continue to maintain their freedom even in the face of world domination.

What was the “u-2 incident” and how did it affect u.s./soviet relations in 1960?