How would a secessionist use slavery to construct an argument defending a state's
right to leave the union?
southern states had only ratified the constitution after an agreement with the
north that slavery would never be abolished.
slavery had been listed in the declaration of independence as an unalienable
right that no government could violate.
slavery had been accepted at the time of the constitution when the union was
created; therefore, if slavery was abolished so was the union.
if legally owned property, like slaves, could be abolished by the national
government, states could secede to protect their rights,

quickly

I think the answer is Slavery had been accepted at the time of the Constitution when the Union was

created; therefore, if slavery was abolished so was the Union.

Explanation:

I'm taking a test right now so I really don't know. Please tell me if this is wrong.

If legally owned property, like slaves, could be abolished by the national government, states could secede to protect their rights

Explanation:

One of the main arguments of the Southern whites to defend secession was the State’s rights. The southern States defended that the Federation says that the Federal Government and state governments are equal upon the Constitution, which means that it would not be possible for the Union to prohibit slavery because they did not have the authority to do so.

if you could provide the poem below, i'd be happy to you!

explanation:

you didn't give us the poem, or the title of the poem. but it is essential for you to give us that, otherwise we can not detect when the poem has a tonal shift!

there were 6 major base camps.   the base camps were located in alva, fort reno, fort sill, the madill provisional internment camp headquarters, mcalester and camp gruber.