"the legislation of the republic is in the hands of this handful of slaveholders. the body which gives the supreme law of the land, has just acceded to their demands, and dared to declare that under the charter of the nation, men of african descent are not citizens of the united states and can not be — that the ordinance of 1787 was void — that the american congress has no power to prevent the enslavement of men in the national territories — that the inhabitants themselves of the territories have no power to exclude human bondage from their midst — and that men of color can not be suitors for justice in the courts of the united states! "--the albany (new york) evening journal, 1857the author in this editorial is reacting to the supreme court decision in:
a)plessy v. ferguson
b)worcester v. georgia
c)dred scott v. sandford
d)thomas richardson v. the city of boston

Option C, Dred Scott v. Sandford, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was a milestone judgement in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this particular case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. Constitution was not intended to give the citizenship of America to the Black community regardless of whether they were free or enslaved, and thus the rights associated with it and given to the citizens of America would not be applicable on them. Moreover, the Supreme Court declared that Congress does not have the power to eliminate slavery from any region of the United States.

In the given phrase, the author of the editorial is reacting to the decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case.

c holding free elections

explanation:

hitler's  "rise" can be considered to have ended in march 1933, after the reichstag adopted the enabling act of 1933 in that month. president paul von hindenburg had already appointedhitler  as chancellor on 30 january 1933 after a series of parliamentary elections and associated backroom intrigues.