which of these situations was only possible after the neolithic revolution?
a. a father teaches his daughter how to find nutritious fruits and berries.
b. a farmer experiments to learn which crops to grow best in his soil
c. a group of hunters develops complex strategies for hunting large animals
d. a tribe bands together to share food and child-rearing responsibilities

B. A farmer experiments to learn which crops to grow best in his soil.

Explanation:

Before the Neolithic revolution, humans lived in nomadic societies and had two main preoccupations - hunting and gathering.

They were organized in such a way that gatherers gathered wild fruits, shellfish, vegetables etc. while hunters (predominantly men) hunted wild animals.

The Neolithic revolution represents a change from nomadic to settled life. People became familiar with agriculture and domestication of animals and plants. This led to settlement, since they found a way to produce and satisfy their needs themselves and didn't need to look for them no longer.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is