History, 15.12.2019 20:31 luisdelacruzoct23

In mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?
a. banks cannot be created by congress.
b. states can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.
c. a federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.
d. banks may only be created by congress, not by individuals

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

The correct option here is A.

The McCulloch v. Maryland case began when the state of Maryland wanted to impose taxes on the National Bank created by the Federal government, thus implying the state power over the federal government as they believed the Congress did not have the power to create a National Bank. The court upheld that under the Necessary and Proper clause, the Federal government did have the power to create the bank and this meant that the state law cannot impede the actions of the Federal government that are constitutional.

Answer from: alma79

In McCulloch c. Maryland, the State of Maryland argued that:

(A) Banks can not be created by Congress.

Further explanation

Since the creation of the United States, many states wanted to keep their independence and not be under the control of the new American Congress. It had been the reason for long debates between supporters of Virginia's plan and New Jersey plan supporters.

This rebellion of states against central power continued after the ratification of the constitution. In that case, Maryland did not want the US National Bank to compete with its local banks and required it to pay an annual fee to work in that state. The bank refused to pay this tax, and the state of Maryland complained that the bank was illegal.

The Maryland judges ruled in favor of the state assembly, but the US national bank appealed to the US Supreme Court, which confirmed its legality. Judge Marshall pointed out that the US Congress had more power than the states, and it had the right to create banking institutions. He explained if the authorization to create a national bank was not written in the constitution, it was because this subject was minor.

Learn moreRoe v. Wade: Plessy v. Ferguson: Furman v. Georgia: Answer details

Subject: History

Chapter: The 19th Century

Keywords: The US National Bank, Maryland, the constitution of the United States

Answer from: Quest

What research did you learn from?

Answer from: Quest

the law supported victims of political persecution.

explanation:

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 14:00

When early settlers began to move north, they moved north of the 49th parallel. puget sound. seattle. the columbia river.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Who was william johnson? a. a revolutionary war veteran b. was the most prominent free black in mississippi c. a field slave d. inventor of the cotton gin

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 06:30

What was the effect of the industrial revolution on the working class ?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

Which is a result of the free exercise clause? parents can prevent their children from being vaccinated. people with a religious objection to military service cannot be drafted. businesses that sell religious materials can be open only on sundays. amish children do not have to attend school past the eighth grade.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

In mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?
a. banks cannot be created by...

Questions