subject
History, 30.10.2019 19:31 sebastianapolo5

What is the difference between interpreting historical and interpreting historical narratives

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:40
3. describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority. then explain whether you think the rule of law would likely be respected under such a government.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Plz me in 1756 george washington was sent on a mission to, a. build a fort at the point where the allegheny and monogahela rivers form the ohio river. b. attack the french at fort duquesne. c. attack the french at fort neccessity. d. deliver a message to the french demanding that they leave the ohio valley.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
Violence or the threat of violence carried out for political purposes is called a) glasnost b) terrorism c) perestroika d) stagflation
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What is the difference between interpreting historical and interpreting historical narratives...
Questions
question
History, 11.09.2019 17:20