How did the second continental congress try to make peace with britain after the battle of bunker hill? a .sending a delegate to britain b sending the olive branch petition c refusing to fight for the british d uniting the 13 colonies needs wit answers

Explanation:

The Lexington and Concord triggered a new gathering of colonists: On May 10, the Second Colonial Congress met. Among the members of this gathering are radicals. Members of Congress decided last time to try to resolve the issue peacefully:  they sent the King a "Petition of an Olive Branch." When that petition was denied, and in response  the Prohibitory Act arrived at the British government, and the last reasons for loyalty to the British crown were gone.

At the very beginning of the work of the Second Continental Congress, the question of the independence of the colonies has not yet been raised, and those delegates who support the independence are not considered opportunistic.  publicly come forward with such a program. As early as June 6, 1775, when Congress passed the Declaration  on the reasons and necessity of reaching for arms, the political aim is to preserve the self-governing  status and freedoms within the British Empire. Yet during this first year the number of supporters of independence will grow steadily. For part of the colonists, after great losses  and casualties at the Battle of Bunker Hill, self-government was simply no longer a sufficient goal of the war;  others felt overwhelmed by England's response to events  in the colonies (Prohibitory Act banned all overseas trade of colonies without exception).

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]

not really sure i needed the points. sorry