Under the articles of confederation, congress had no power to make states enforce laws. why was this a problem? the congress could take over the state governments. the states could not work closely with congress. it took away the importance of laws passed by congress. it made the state governments unable to pass new laws.

I would say C. It took away the importance of laws passed by Congress.

Explanation:

Since under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no power to make states enforce laws. They had no way to make the states obey as they made the Articles of Confederation very weak in order to make sure there was no "taxation without representation" again. Congress had no power to tax the states or regulate commerce. Basically if Congress tried to pass a law it meant pretty much nothing and the states wouldn't have to obey to it if they didn't want to, which means it took away the importance from the laws they passed.

the process is called revolution because it was a process of great economic-social transformations that began in england in the xviii century.

the industrial mode of production spread throughout much of the northern hemisphere throughout the xix and early xx centuries.

the effect of this revolution was the distance between the countries, with respect to economic and political power.   after all, not all industrialized at the same time, remaining in the condition of suppliers of raw materials and agricultural products to the industrialized countries.

these differences mark to this day the nations of the world that are divided between developed and developing countries. one way to measure whether a country is advanced is to assess how industrialized it is.

hello,

your answer whould be d