What changes did world war l bring to the everyday lives of americans? how lasting were these changes?

World War 1 brought many changes in the American lives socially, politically and economically. These effects were still noticeable.

Explanation:

World War 1 was one of the deadliest wars, this war brought huge effect on society of America. World War 1 drowned four monarchies that are Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Russia. This War ended colonialism, so that the people enhanced more nationalism, later other countries started colonial revolts in, the Middle East, Southeast Asia and Africa. This War made European countries debt and this made the US ranking first in industrial power. Till now there is a great change in America.

The everyday life of the Americans after world war I changed in the following way -

- many skilled workers lost their jobs

- the women were given the right to vote

- many farmers became bankrupt

- Many progressive reforms were introduced by the federal government that changed the lifestyle of the Americans.

Explanation:

After world war I, the  rate of immigration increased and caused demographic imbalance. Immigrants took jobs against low wages which made the skilled workers lose their jobs. In the recession that followed the war, many people and institutions went bankrupt. But on the other hand, many reforms were introduced and implemented to rejuvenate the nation with new energy. These reforms granted women the right to vote. Also men gained new opportunities of growth. The negative and positive consequences of world war I are felt until to some extent right until today.

the dominoes began to fall. the surrender at appomattox took place a week later on april 9. while it was the most significant surrender to take place during the civil war, gen. robert e. lee, the confederacy's most respected commander, surrendered only his army of northern virginia to union gen. ulysses s. grant

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is