Describe why the election of 1896 could be considered a turning point in american politics. be sure to consider the successes and failures of populism. also consider what happened to the populist party, as well as the democrats and the republicans, in the years after the election.

The 1896 Presidential Elections actually did change the picture of the United States politics by making it clear that mere popularity can't help any party win an election. It brought to the light that there are factors that demand equilibrium and loss of none, no matter if anyone gets profited or not.

Explanation:

The 1896 Presidential Elections could be considered as the turning point in the history of US politics :

Because the elections were viewed as a fight between the country and the city which was eventually dominated by the city and finally won. For the first time ever, a single person, William Jennings Bryan, was nominated by two different parties as their presidential candidate.

The successes and failures of populism:

While populism seemed to be a good idea to the farmers and other country people, it raised fear in the minds of factory workers and the industry owner as they believed that the free silver policy would ruin the US economy. Thus, populism was both a success and a failure.

Aftermath faced by the Populist Party, as well as the Democrats and the Republicans, in the years after the election:

The populist ideas after the defeat of their candidate started dimming off and the Populist Party was never seen to be active ever again. The only two dominant parties in the politics of the US remained to be were the Democratic Party and the Republic Party.  The Republic Party rose to be more dominant in the following elections.

b. africa to the americas

explanation:

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.