did edward jenner's ethics and be sure to include whether or not his experiment would pass an ethical review according to the who guidelines and the nuremberg code.

Abstract. In 1798 Dr Edward Jenner published his famous account of “vaccination”. ... Proponents of immunisation, a technique that developed from Jenner's work, often claim that a research ethics committee, had it existed in the 1790s, might have rejected his work.

Explanation:

Explanation:

  Edward Jenners develops vaccination for smallpox, saves countless lives in the process, yet is frequently accused of conducting unethical experiments. Unethical experiments are human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics.

  On May 14, 1796, Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, an eight-year-old, a material obtained from a milkmaid who had cowpox. In a few weeks, Jenner deliberately infected Phipps with smallpox to see if he would develop the disease. This was unethical by modern standards because exposing a young boy to one of the most deadly diseases in the world could result in death. Thankfully, Jenner’s experiment was successful and James did not develop smallpox.

  Jenner did not know what caused smallpox or why exposure to cowpox was protective, but he spent the rest of his life promoting his method and supplying dried cowpox matter to people all over the world.  He certainly intended to do good to Phipps by protecting him from smallpox, but he could also have caused great harm if James had died from the disease. If he had carried out his experiment today, Jenner would have been struck off the Medical Register, meaning that he could no longer practice as a doctor. Also, according to the modern Nuremberg code, Jenner did violate many of the elements.

john adams was the 2nd president of the united states.

explanation:

i think it would be reparing roads