In 35 words or fewer, explain how valid this historian's interpretation is. what could he do to improve its validity?

Aor b but i'm going with b

The question of what caused the full effects of the radical stage, also called the second french revolution by some historians, which shook the political and social reforms in france have caught the attention of many scholars, particularly because of principles implemented during this stage which is contradictory to the fundamental principle of the french revolution itself, by using dictatorship to create equality.

1history is previous events that have occurred in the past