Writing a thesis that answers this question: what deeper lesson emerges after contrasting both items? (comparing the crucible by arthur miller to mccarthyism and the red scare in the 1950s)
sub-questions provided for brainstorming: (kinda want to answer the first one)
a. why and/or how people will abuse power when security becomes the primary concern over individual beliefs?
b. when, if ever, is it justified to sacrifice individual liberties for national security?
c. how does intolerance play the role of societal scapegoats?
d. what role do scapegoats play in conflict between individual liberties vs. national security?

the following best describes postwar era writers in their works:

many writers,authors,novelists,poets concentrated more on social art and social writing and stayed away from political writings.

a standing committee

explanation:

a case involving the laws of a single state.

the correct answer is: (1) affected by gerrymandering; (2) not affected by gerrymandering.

gerrymandering is known as a practice that intends to establish a some kind of political advantage for a particular party or group. to do this district boundaries are manipulated. the new resulting district is named a gerrymandering.

in other words, what gerrymandering does is to draw the boundaries of electoral districts trying to benefit the party who is doing it. sometimes, the party controlling the legislature will redraw it so they can maximize the number of districts they are likely to control.