1. what two things does green say the revolution were not about?

Green said that the revolution was not tea and taxes

Explanation:

John Green has a very different take on how the American revolution started and why the locals had an uprising against British colonial rule.

He explains that the 'American Revolution' was something completely different from the American Revolutionary War which was a direct, armed conflict with the British.

While the Boston tea party clearly showed a disdain for local Americans, the revolution did not start because of the taxes on tea. The rallying cry 'no taxation without representation' showed a deep rooted belief in many colonists that they were actually seen as second class citizens of the British crown and did not enjoy the same benefits as others.

He also explains how the revolution was for 'rich white men' and for more than a century, the country was run in a way that would benefit only this class of people.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

the adoption by russian princes of the mongols' diplomatic rituals