What questions should a historian ask to determine whether a source is credible? select three options.
is it relevant to the subject or event?
is the writing style clear and professional?
does it contain information that is outdated?
is the author an expert on the subject or event?
does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

The three options are:

- Is it relevant to the subject or event?

- Is the author an expert on the subject or event?

- Does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

Explanation:

The question fails to specify whether it's referring to primary or secondary sources, but speaking in general terms, a historian will, first of all, look at a source to see if it contains information that is relevant to the topic they are studying.  In the case of a secondary source it is important to know if the author of the book is an expert on the topic.  It is also important to know if the source discusses a particular version of the historical event or period in order to know if there might be a bias.

Outdated information is not an issue for a historian because they work with old documents and texts all the time.  Old sources still contain very valuable information.  The writing style is also not something a historian is too concerned about because most primary sources are not written in a clear or professional writing style.

A: is it relevant to the subject or event?

D: Is the author an expert on the subject or event?

E: does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

Explanation:

yes te ottoma empire did fall in the   end but something emerged the answer to this question is turkey turkey ermeged   after the ottoma empires falll

the two atomic bombs dropped on japan in 1945 killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of people, and their effects are still being felt today. the uranium bomb detonated over hiroshima on 6 august 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of tnt.