subject
History, 19.09.2019 20:00 kaykayhodge

Many historians have accused gengis khan and the mongols of being murderous barbarians who did nothing more than wreak havoc and destruction on the civilizations with which they came into contact. would you consider them guilty or not guilty of this charge? why or why not?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:10
Sole i will mark brainlist to who answer
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
You will now write an essay of at least three paragraphs that takes a position on an opinion in hazelwood v. kuhlmeier. you may choose to support the majority opinion or justice brennan's dissenting opinion. you should support your argument with reasons provided in the opinions, although you may also give reasons of your own. your essay should also decision in the case
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Read this scenario applying to the bill of rights. which of tristan's constitutional rights was violated? a. freedom of religion b. freedom of assembly c. protection against unlawful accusations d. protection against unwarranted search and seizure
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Why did alexander go primarily east and south from macedonia and greece in his conquest
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Many historians have accused gengis khan and the mongols of being murderous barbarians who did nothi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 19:50