How did the supreme court rulings in 1883 work against the civil rights act of 1875?
a. the supreme court rulings banned black patrons from using public facilities.
b. the supreme court rulings gave power over civil rights to the federal government.
c. the supreme court rulings gave additional rights to all americans.
d. the supreme court rulings said civil rights were decided by state and local law.

D. The Supreme Court rulings said civil rights were decided by state and local law.

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Act of 1875, presented by Charles Sumner and Benjamin F. Butler, established the guarantee that everyone, regardless of race, color, or precondition of servitude, was entitled to the same treatment in public services, such as hotels , public transport, theaters, and other places of recreation. This law had little impact on nineteenth-century American society.

Soon after the promulgation, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the law was unconstitutional in several respects, arguing that Congress did not have control over individuals or private companies. With the white Democratic representatives of the South united in a solid bloc within the Congress, and having an exaggerated power within it, Congress did not pass another civil rights law until 1957.

In 1890, Louisiana passed a law that required the creation of separate wagons for blacks and whites on the railroads. Louisiana law emphasized the differentiation between "white," "black," and "colored" (referring to people of mixed descent). The law specified that blacks could not mix with white people, but "colored" people were able to travel in the same wagons as whites until 1890. A group of black, white and mestizo citizens of New Orleans formed an association whose objective It was the repeal of the law. The group convinced Homer Plessy, who was only an eighth "black" and light complexion, to challenge her.

In 1892, Plessy bought a first-class ticket from the East Louisiana Railroad company at a New Orleans station. Having boarded the train, he informed the drivers of his racial lineage and took a seat in the exclusive white car. He was ordered to leave his seat and go to the wagon for mestizos. Plessy refused and was immediately arrested. The New Orleans Citizens Committee took the case to the Supreme Court of the United States, where they lost the Plessy case against Ferguson in 1896, when the Court declared that "separate but equal" policies were constitutional. The litigation contributed to 58 more years of legal discrimination against black and mestizo people in the United States.

10 states did

~courtney

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]