The judicial power of the supreme court can be found in
of the constitution.

In your question, it's asking if the judicial power that the Supreme Court has could be found in the constitution.

This question is asking if you can read the constitution and find the judicial powers of the Supreme Court in it.

The reason why the question would be considered true is because you can find the judicial powers of the Supreme Court in the constitution.

In order to see the judicial powers that the Supreme Court has, you would need to go to "Article III" in the constitution.

In Article III, it will give you all of the powers that the Supreme Court has. If the powers that the Supreme Court has wasn't on the constitution, then the Supreme Court would have no official rules for the powers that they have, and could possibly eliminate the "checks and balances" in the constitution.

This is the reason why the statement would be TRUE.

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion