subject
History, 28.06.2019 17:30 ultimatesaiyan

Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the
vietnam war. he argues that the united states should have
never entered the conflict. he points out that vietnam did
not have any strategic value to the united states, nor did it
offer access to natural resources. he also notes that the
french had already been forced to abandon their colony in
vietnam because of fierce resistance from the vietnamese
people. finally, he explains that the u. s. military had never
before fought in jungles like the ones in vietnam.
which statement best summarizes the historian's claim?
o
a. the united states should never have participated in the vietnam
war
o
b. the u. s. military did not have experience fighting in jungles.
o
c. vietnam did not offer the united states access to natural
resources.
o
d. fierce resistance from the vietnamese forced france to abandon
vietnam.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
What alliance later grew into the political, populist party, also known as the people’s party?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:10
Need it now explain gorbachev’s policy of glasnost. how did this policy change the soviet union?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
How was george washington able to defeat the british in the battle of trenton and princeton
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What is dussel's profession? a. law b. business c. dentistry fyi: this is based on the story anne franks
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the
vietnam war. he argues that the united st...
Questions
question
History, 09.01.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 09.01.2021 01:00
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 09.01.2021 01:00