Which explains a case of a conflict over water rights?

a pakistani terrorist group threatens to contaminate the water supply of a major city with poison.

north korea releases the floodgates on a dam, causing flash floods that kill six south koreans.

natives of sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and killing of thousands.

during the libyan civil war, loyalists seize a water plant and cut off the water supply to the capital.

The correct answer is C) Natives of Sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and killing of thousands.

The statement that explains a case of a conflict over water rights is that Natives of Sudan have not wanted to share their limited water supply, leading to civil war and the killing of thousands.

This is the case of a conflict over water rights that is aggravated by the terrible famine that the country was suffering. Political conflicts, economic hardships, and climate conditions have affected Sudan so much to the degree to have a humanitarian crisis due to famine. Millions of people are in risk to die of hunger and many more had decided to emigrate to other countries.

answer: i cant no exerpt

explanation:

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho