subject
History, 31.10.2019 12:31 camirialchambers17

Eight months after the schenck decision, the court again applied the clear and present danger principle. holmes dissented in that case, stating that unlike the schenck case, actions of the convicted man in teh second case had little or no effect on teh nation's war effort. what do you think this reveals about holmes attitude toward free speeck guarantees?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:00
Why did settlers decide to establish olympia where they did? they thought the land was good for farming. they could trade with american indians. they found water access to puget sound. they were given land by the us government.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
This is the belief that a nation must develop and maintain a strong military force in order to pursue and defend its national interests.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Why did many nations resist napoleons rules
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Which letter correctly labels the mississippi river? a b c labeled map of the mississippi river and surrounding regions.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Eight months after the schenck decision, the court again applied the clear and present danger princi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2020 23:02