Why was the deepwater horizon oil spill significant?

the great lakes still show signs from the disaster.
it was the largest accidental marine spill in history.
the company responsible avoided paying any fines for the spill.
the cleanup effort went so quickly that lasting damage was avoided.

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill shows how dedicated different individuals in society are at keeping their environment clean, and protecting both the animals and the animal habitat. Humans are able to gather together and solve problems as groups and teams without blame and without cost; it only happens if individuals feel OBLIGATED to do so.

It was the largest accidental marine spill in history.

Explanation:

Deepwater Horizon was a semi-submersible oil platform with rapid positioning of ultra-deep waters built in 2001 and located in the Gulf of Mexico, shared by the United States, Cuba and Mexico. It sank on April 22, 2010 as a result of an explosion that had taken place two days before, causing the most important oil spill in history, estimated at 779,000 tons of crude oil.

The first damages affected the marshes of the mouth and the delta of the Mississippi, extending to the area of Louisiana and other sectors of Florida and Cuba.

The purpose of the Deepwater Horizon tower was to drill oil wells in the subsoil, moving from one place to another as required. Once the drilling was finished, the extraction was done by another team. Deepwater Horizon was owned by Transocean and had been leased to BP until September 2013. In September 2009 it drilled the deepest oil well in history.

As a result of the accident, 11 staff members lost their lives.

Along with the sinking of the Petrobras 36 platform in 2001 with the same dead, it has been the worst tragedy on an oil rig since the explosion of the English platform Piper Alpha in 1988, which caused 167 deaths.

your answer is

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

explanation:

hitler's  "rise" can be considered to have ended in march 1933, after the reichstag adopted the enabling act of 1933 in that month. president paul von hindenburg had already appointedhitler  as chancellor on 30 january 1933 after a series of parliamentary elections and associated backroom intrigues.