To which side of the immigration debate does the following argument apply? immigrants who are willing to work for lower wages take jobs away from americans. no immigrants open borders

The argument definitely belongs to the anti-immigration side. The pro-immigration side uses a higher percentage of pathos and emotional arguments to justify their views. The anti-immigration side uses a higher percentage of logos and socioeconomic arguments to justify their arguments.

It is a proven socioeconomic fact in a capitalistic economy that a huge influx of unskilled workers who do not speak the local language or speake it very little are willing to work more hours for lower salaries than local workers who speak the language. Industrialist usually use them to apply pressure on workers' salaries in order to keep them very low, especially in industrial agriculture.

gaius cassius longinus and marcus junius brutus, former enemies of julius caesar who'd joined the roman senate, led caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves "the liberators." and the second one is   the assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius longinus, decimus junius brutus albinus, and marcus junius brutus. they stabbed caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march 15 march 44 bc.

answer; /// i do believe that the correct answer is (a); a farming tribe that settled primarily along the mississippi and arkansas rivers;