How did the federalists and anti-federalist fix their issue about the constitution? explain

After the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, two positions towards the proposed Constitution raised, the Federalists were in favor of the proposed Constitution and were advocates for a strong federal government, hence their name. The Anti-federalists feared that a strong federal government could lead to an abuse of power, and that the states' sovereignty and the people's rights could be in jeopardy.

In order to approve the Constitution, a ratification process was needed (nine states in favor) and the Federalists (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay) wrote the Federalist papers under the name of Publius, to persuade the state of New York, and the Anti-Federalists exposed the reasons why a Bill of Rights was needed. The addition of the Bill of Rights drafted by James Madison and adapted as the first ten amendments of the Constitution was how the Federalists and Anti-Federalists fixed their issue.

the fact that could also be added to column b is that during world war ii, specifically between the years 1941 and 1945, japan expanded its territory towards the indonesian territory in what was known later as part of the "pacific war". in that time, japan could conquer the philipines, singapore,   borneo, central java, malang, cebu, sumatra and various other islands of the area, therefore expanding its territory for a brief period of time.

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]