Transportation in the south during the early 19th century was much different than it is today. which is the best description of what it was like? a) most people traveled by foot through trails made by early native americans. b) cars were becoming popular, so interstates and highways began to grow quickly between major cities. c) the amounts of roads and railways were increasing rapidly and steamships were being used to transport goods as well as people. d) only wealthy families had means of transportation; other families were able to get what they needed within their settlements or farm areas.

The correct answer is D, as during the early 19th century, only wealthy families had means of transportation to the north; other families were able to get what they needed within their settlements or farm areas.

The less affluent families could subsist thanks to the economic system prevailing in the South, which based its development on agricultural production. Otherwise, the subsistence of these families would have been impossible, since there were no effective means to access the products from the north quickly.

The transport system of the South was too expensive for the common people and depended mainly on fluvial and coastal traffic by ship; both were closed by the Union Navy during the Civil War. The small railroad system practically collapsed as a result of this, so that by 1864 internal travel was so difficult that the Confederate economy was mutilated.

these conditions long with a short growing season made farming difficult.

explanation:

the north has a climate of warm summers and snowy cold winters. the terrain is rocky, hilly, and not good for farming.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: