Interpret suppose two people who live in adjoining states are having a land dispute. identify the article of the constitution that addresses this issue, and explain how it addresses the problem. a)

Article III of the Constitution of the United States creates the Judicial Power of the federal government of that country. The Judicial Branch is formed by the Supreme Court of the United States and the federal courts of lower rank legally established by Congress.

The second section specifies the jurisdiction of the federal courts and stipulates that trials be jury in all criminal cases, except in cases of impeachment.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and not of general jurisdiction. This means that courts with limited jurisdiction can only judge those cases in which they have jurisdiction.

More presumably article 3, second section, clause 1

"one. The Judiciary will understand in all disputes, both written law and equity, that arise as a result of this Constitution, the laws of the United States and the treaties concluded or that are held under its authority; in all disputes that relate to ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; in all disputes of the Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction; in disputes to which the United States is a party; in disputes between two or more States, between one State and the citizens of another, between citizens of different States, between citizens of the same State claiming land under concessions of different States and between a State or its citizens and States , citizens or foreign subjects. "

okay but whats the question.

explanation:

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: