What is the significance of the us supreme court opinion that words creating a clear and present danger are not protected by the first amendment a. the constitution limits individual rights b. the constitution safeguards individual rights c. the constitution does not limit individual rights d. the constitution does not safeguard individual rights cer - claim, evidence, reasoning!

The correct answer is A. The Constitution limits individual rights

The Clear and Present Danger was a ruling by the US Supreme Court that started with the case Schenck v. the United States in 1919. The court stated that the freedom of speech is not an absolute right, there are times that the government can restrict speech legally, this happens when words are used to create clear and present danger such as wartime.

the answer is A

Explanation:

based on this information, i would advocate against sweatshop labour because it exploits workers in unsafe working conditions with little pay. though sweatshops produce inexpensive goods, they harm the environment, workers, and often use unsafe materials to make consumer goods.