What conflict was solved by the great compromise during the constitutional convention of 1787

The Great Compromise resolved a conflict in views about how representation in the legislature should be arranged -- whether all states got the same representation, or if representation should be based on population size of the state.

Details:

The Great Compromise, arrived at during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787, focused on  the representation of states in Congress. The Great Compromise successfully resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  Initially, the legislature was envisioned as a unicameral (one-chamber) body.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

raw information is your answer

~courtney

answer: a

explanation:  

stocks and bonds are the two main classes of assets investors use in their portfolios. stocks offer an ownership stake in a company, while bonds are akin to loans made to a company (a corporate bond) or other organization (like the u.s. treasury). in general, stocks are considered riskier and more volatile than bonds.

savings accounts are just money in a bank- they are insured by the fdic for up to 250,000.   very little risk

the average mutual fund holds hundreds of different securities, which means mutual fund shareholders gain important diversification at a low price. which means if one stock or bond drops it will have very little affect on the mutual fund - again very little risk